We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.2.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.2.2-rc1/ This includes the source tarball, installers for OS X and Windows, and bindists for amd64/Linux, i386/Linux, amd64/FreeBSD and i386/FreeBSD. 7.2.2 will be a minimal bugfix release, fixing only bugs that cannot be worked around. Please let us know if you find any showstoppers. Thanks Ian, on behalf of the GHC team _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
It's looking good but base is still untrusted out of the box. Is this right?
Chris -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Ian Lynagh Sent: 06 November 2011 13:19 To: [hidden email] Subject: GHC 7.2.2 RC 1 We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.2.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.2.2-rc1/ This includes the source tarball, installers for OS X and Windows, and bindists for amd64/Linux, i386/Linux, amd64/FreeBSD and i386/FreeBSD. 7.2.2 will be a minimal bugfix release, fixing only bugs that cannot be worked around. Please let us know if you find any showstoppers. Thanks Ian, on behalf of the GHC team _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
In reply to this post by Ian Lynagh
On 11/6/2011 5:18 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> 7.2.2 will be a minimal bugfix release, fixing only bugs that cannot be > worked around. Please let us know if you find any showstoppers. > #5531 is still there and no workarounds are known. Also, it's specific for post 7.0.Xs. Not sure if this counts as showstopper, though. Cheers, Kyra _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
In reply to this post by Chris Dornan
I think we should apply the minimal change to make all packages trusted
by default in 7.2.2. Any objections? Cheers, Simon On 06/11/2011 16:36, Chris Dornan wrote: > It's looking good but base is still untrusted out of the box. Is this right? > > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Ian Lynagh > Sent: 06 November 2011 13:19 > To: [hidden email] > Subject: GHC 7.2.2 RC 1 > > > We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.2.2: > > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.2.2-rc1/ > > This includes the source tarball, installers for OS X and Windows, and > bindists for amd64/Linux, i386/Linux, amd64/FreeBSD and i386/FreeBSD. > > 7.2.2 will be a minimal bugfix release, fixing only bugs that cannot be > worked around. Please let us know if you find any showstoppers. > > > Thanks > Ian, on behalf of the GHC team > > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
Y'all have probably seen this, but I have opened #5607 saying a bit more.
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5607 Chris -----Original Message----- From: Simon Marlow [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: 07 November 2011 16:45 To: Chris Dornan Cc: 'Ian Lynagh'; [hidden email]; David Terei Subject: Re: GHC 7.2.2 RC 1 I think we should apply the minimal change to make all packages trusted by default in 7.2.2. Any objections? Cheers, Simon On 06/11/2011 16:36, Chris Dornan wrote: > It's looking good but base is still untrusted out of the box. Is this right? > > Chris _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
In reply to this post by Simon Marlow-7
On 7 November 2011 08:44, Simon Marlow <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I think we should apply the minimal change to make all packages trusted by > default in 7.2.2. Any objections? Agreed. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
In reply to this post by Kyra
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 01:25:11AM +0400, Kyra wrote:
> On 11/6/2011 5:18 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote: > >7.2.2 will be a minimal bugfix release, fixing only bugs that cannot be > >worked around. Please let us know if you find any showstoppers. > > > #5531 is still there and no workarounds are known. Also, it's > specific for post 7.0.Xs. Not sure if this counts as showstopper, > though. We don't have a fix for that yet, so it's very unlikely it'll be fixed in 7.2.2 (which will be released very soon). But we still have ambitions to release 7.4.1 later this year! Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
In reply to this post by Ian Lynagh
> We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.2.2:
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.2.2-rc1/ Thanks, I did a test build for Fedora 17 Development. If you wish to test it on Fedora you can get the srpm or binary packages from: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/scratch/petersen/task_3496432/ (note that F17 is now on a newer major version of gmp than F16 and earlier, so the binary packages won't install directly on current releases.) I am planning to update Fedora 17 Rawhide from 7.0.4 to 7.2.2 when it is released. Jens _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
In reply to this post by Ian Lynagh
Any chance #5421 (<<loop>> in withMVar (reproducible, but with large test case) could be backported to 7.2.2?
-n
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Ian Lynagh <[hidden email]> wrote: 7.2.2 will be a minimal bugfix release, fixing only bugs that cannot be _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
Sorry, no. That one has a workaround: define your own fixIO:
fixIO :: (a -> IO a) -> IO a fixIO k = do m <- newEmptyMVar ans <- unsafeInterleaveIO (takeMVar m) result <- k ans putMVar m result return result Cheers, Simon On 11/11/2011 06:16, Nathan Howell wrote: > Any chance #5421 (<<loop>> in withMVar (reproducible, but with large > test case) could be backported to 7.2.2? > > -n > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Ian Lynagh <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > 7.2.2 will be a minimal bugfix release, fixing only bugs that cannot be > worked around. Please let us know if you find any showstoppers. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
We're hitting something that looks similar with a Chan on 7.2.1, though they might be related..
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Simon Marlow <[hidden email]> wrote:
Sorry, no. That one has a workaround: define your own fixIO: _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
Chans are basically linked lists with the next pointer wrapped in an
MVar. The source is actually very readable. So yes, it probably is the same thing. Best, Leon On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Nathan Howell <[hidden email]> wrote: > We're hitting something that looks similar with a Chan on 7.2.1, though they > might be related.. > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Simon Marlow <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Sorry, no. That one has a workaround: define your own fixIO: >> >> fixIO :: (a -> IO a) -> IO a >> fixIO k = do >> m <- newEmptyMVar >> ans <- unsafeInterleaveIO (takeMVar m) >> result <- k ans >> putMVar m result >> return result > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > [hidden email] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users > > _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [hidden email] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |