Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage

Thomas Schilling-2
I just noticed that the latest version of hoopl (shipped with 7.6.3) is not on Hackage.  Is there a reason for this (other than oversight)?

/ Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130731/4b1ab652/attachment.pgp>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage

Carter Schonwald
relatedly: is norman ramsey (pro)actively maintaining it?

based upon remarks on #ghc earlier today, it sounded like a number of
people have warts/wishes about how to improve hoopl or make it nicer if
they could. (or at least that was my take away from their remarks, i'll
leave them to clarify further)


On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Thomas Schilling
<nominolo at googlemail.com>wrote:

> I just noticed that the latest version of hoopl (shipped with 7.6.3) is
> not on Hackage.  Is there a reason for this (other than oversight)?
>
> / Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130731/d165873b/attachment.htm>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage

Simon Peyton Jones
In reply to this post by Thomas Schilling-2
No I think it's just oversight.  Do upload it!  thanks

Simon

|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
|  Schilling
|  Sent: 31 July 2013 19:53
|  To: ghc-devs at haskell.org
|  Subject: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage
|  
|  I just noticed that the latest version of hoopl (shipped with 7.6.3) is not on
|  Hackage.  Is there a reason for this (other than oversight)?
|  
|  / Thomas




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage

Simon Peyton Jones
In reply to this post by Carter Schonwald
I?m copying Norman so that he can speak for himself.  Indeed the hoopl.cabal file lists him as the Maintainer.

But I believe that he is not *actively* working on Hoopl, and would be content for others to contribute to it (ideas, patches).  Norman?

Simon

From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Carter Schonwald
Sent: 31 July 2013 22:18
To: Thomas Schilling
Cc: ghc-devs at haskell.org
Subject: Re: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage

relatedly: is norman ramsey (pro)actively maintaining it?

based upon remarks on #ghc earlier today, it sounded like a number of people have warts/wishes about how to improve hoopl or make it nicer if they could. (or at least that was my take away from their remarks, i'll leave them to clarify further)

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Thomas Schilling <nominolo at googlemail.com<mailto:nominolo at googlemail.com>> wrote:
I just noticed that the latest version of hoopl (shipped with 7.6.3) is not on Hackage.  Is there a reason for this (other than oversight)?

/ Thomas

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs at haskell.org<mailto:ghc-devs at haskell.org>
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130731/6b53dc0a/attachment.htm>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage

Simon Marlow-7
In reply to this post by Simon Peyton Jones
Right - I made a lot of changes while working on the new codegen.
Norman signed off on them (in principle at least) so it should be fine
to upload the package.  I should admit I did very limited testing
outside of GHC's use case, and GHC even contains a copy of some of the
hoopl code with its own specialisations (the core dataflow algorithm in
particular).

Cheers,
        Simon

On 31/07/13 22:37, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:

> No I think it's just oversight.  Do upload it!  thanks
>
> Simon
>
> |  -----Original Message-----
> |  From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> |  Schilling
> |  Sent: 31 July 2013 19:53
> |  To: ghc-devs at haskell.org
> |  Subject: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage
> |
> |  I just noticed that the latest version of hoopl (shipped with 7.6.3) is not on
> |  Hackage.  Is there a reason for this (other than oversight)?
> |
> |  / Thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>