Missing Traversable instances

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Missing Traversable instances

Sylvain HENRY
Hi,

I would like to use a Traversable instance for "Either e". I have read it is a recurrent demand [1][2] to integrate it in base. Could we do it for the next release?

Thanks
Sylvain

[1] http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Proposal-Add-the-missing-instances-for-Traversable-Either-b-and-Traversable-b-td5715398.html

[2] http://osdir.com/ml/libraries@.../2011-01/msg00325.html

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Missing Traversable instances

John Wiegley-3
>>>>> hsyl20  <[hidden email]> writes:

> I would like to use a Traversable instance for "Either e". I have read it is a
> recurrent demand [1][2] to integrate it in base. Could we do it for the next
> release?

++

--
John Wiegley
FP Complete                         Haskell tools, training and consulting
http://fpcomplete.com               johnw on #haskell/irc.freenode.net
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Missing Traversable instances

Edward Kmett-2
In reply to this post by Sylvain HENRY
You're all set. We've had it inside HEAD for a couple of months.

instance Traversable (Either a) -- Defined in ‛Data.Traversable’

-Edward



On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:55 PM, hsyl20 . <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I would like to use a Traversable instance for "Either e". I have read it is a recurrent demand [1][2] to integrate it in base. Could we do it for the next release?

Thanks
Sylvain

[1] http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Proposal-Add-the-missing-instances-for-Traversable-Either-b-and-Traversable-b-td5715398.html

[2] http://osdir.com/ml/libraries@.../2011-01/msg00325.html

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries



_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Missing Traversable instances

Sylvain HENRY
Great! :)


2013/9/27 Edward Kmett <[hidden email]>
You're all set. We've had it inside HEAD for a couple of months.

instance Traversable (Either a) -- Defined in ‛Data.Traversable’

-Edward



On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:55 PM, hsyl20 . <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I would like to use a Traversable instance for "Either e". I have read it is a recurrent demand [1][2] to integrate it in base. Could we do it for the next release?

Thanks
Sylvain

[1] http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Proposal-Add-the-missing-instances-for-Traversable-Either-b-and-Traversable-b-td5715398.html

[2] http://osdir.com/ml/libraries@.../2011-01/msg00325.html

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries




_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries