Re: ANN: hyperdrive on github

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ANN: hyperdrive on github

Kẏra ​


On Sunday, July 7, 2013 at 1:12:47 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Richard Wallace <<a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="a_Vj5NTMQJYJ" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href=&#39;javascript:&#39;;return true;" onclick="this.href=&#39;javascript:&#39;;return true;">rwal...@...> wrote:

It's fair enough that it might not be practical in the long run, but might it be better to start with the intention of using it, helping to evolve it where necessary, and only dropping use of it if it becomes absolutely necessary? I think the interoperability and collaboration with other, similar efforts would be of tremendous benefit for everyone.

We just need to wait 2-3 weeks. All the types in the code right now are just place holders. I've used the http-types library in some of my packages like web-routes. Deciding if it is right for hyperdrive will happen -- but not quite yet. I can only think about so many things at once :)

- jeremy

is Hyperdrive still planned to be the server for Happstack/Clckwrks?

--
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ANN: hyperdrive on github

Jeremy Shaw-3
Yes! I've been lost of in the lands of client-side framework
development and other distractions. But I think about working on
hyperdrive all the time. Now is actually a good time (for me) to start
up work on it again -- so I'll start work this week. I am going to
blog the development process so that there is a lot of opportunity to
get feedback early on.

- jeremy

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Kẏra ​ <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sunday, July 7, 2013 at 1:12:47 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Richard Wallace
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's fair enough that it might not be practical in the long run, but
>>> might it be better to start with the intention of using it, helping to
>>> evolve it where necessary, and only dropping use of it if it becomes
>>> absolutely necessary? I think the interoperability and collaboration with
>>> other, similar efforts would be of tremendous benefit for everyone.
>>
>>
>> We just need to wait 2-3 weeks. All the types in the code right now are
>> just place holders. I've used the http-types library in some of my packages
>> like web-routes. Deciding if it is right for hyperdrive will happen -- but
>> not quite yet. I can only think about so many things at once :)
>>
>> - jeremy
>
>
> is Hyperdrive still planned to be the server for Happstack/Clckwrks?
>
> --
>
> "Haskell Pipes" group.
>
> email to [hidden email].
>

--